Monthly schedule updates stacked for comparison with variance markings

For Developers, Owners & Public Entities

Schedule Update Analysis

Update review compares reported progress and revisions with the project record, period by period, and explains any discrepancies found.

Update review may consider changes in progress, forecasts, logic and durations alongside other project evidence. Comparison periods, reporting frequency and the significance of revisions depend on the assignment and available information.

Project team reviewing progress documents in a site meeting room

Possible assignment considerations

In practice

  1. 01

    Compare against the previous period

    Assess each update against the one before it rather than in isolation, the differences carry the information.

  2. 02

    Test actual dates against the field

    Check reported actual starts and finishes against daily reports and observed progress rather than accepting them as stated.

  3. 03

    Query logic and duration changes

    Identify revisions between periods and ask for the reason while the answer still exists.

  4. 04

    Consider the reporting arrangement

    What reporting format and frequency relate to the assignment, available information and relevant contract provisions?

Considerations and limitations

Questions and limitations to consider

Analyzing only when worried

Waiting until problems appear to review updates, when earlier periods are harder to evaluate.

Accepting reported actuals

Taking recorded dates at face value without checking them against the field record.

Silence read as agreement

Receiving updates period after period without comment, and finding that silence characterized as acceptance.

Schedule Update Analysis

Talk to a consultant

For conflict review, give party names and a brief nonconfidential description only. Please wait until Oxley confirms intake before sending confidential or substantive materials.